Nowości

Sheldon Danielson, "Divine Farce: A Scientific / Philosophic Romp Through Intelligent Design" (2005)

"Talk Reason" published: Nov 07, 2005; http://www.talkreason.org/articles/IntelligentDesign.cfm --- Abstract --- The history of science can be regarded as the gradual process of removing the supernatural from our understanding of natural events and replacing it with concepts of material causality, matter and energy. In so doing, science has often found itself in conflict with religious dogma committed to a contrary view of the natural order. In the past such conflicts have usually taken the form of open contests between competing magisteria: theological on the one hand, empirical and rational on the other. Intelligent Design presents science with a qualitatively new kind of challenge: theology masquerading as science – a modern Trojan Horse. In responding to this subterfuge, this paper reviews the history and philosophy of science, neo-Darwinian evolution theory, and examines in detail some of ID’s specific claims.

"Attacks on journal editor raise questions about academic freedom and intelligent design" (2005)

Catholic News Agency November 13, 2005; http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=5384

Stephen Pincock, "Monkey business" (2005)

http://news.ft.com/cms/s/82d115f8-2029-11da-b59e-00000e2511c8.html

Rush Holt, "Intelligent Design: It's Not Even Wrong" (2005)

http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/9/8/183216/1039

Tom Heneghan, "Vienna cardinal draws lines in Intelligent Design" (2005)

Reuters; http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?storyID=2005-11-20T111756Z_01_KWA040635_RTRUKOC_0_US-RELIGION-EVOLUTION-CARDINAL.xml

Stephen C. Meyer, "Not by chance. From bacterial propulsion systems to human DNA, evidence of intelligent design is everywhere" (2005)

"National Post" 01 December, 2005; http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/issuesideas/story.html?id=8f7f51f2-a196-4677-9399-46f4f17b5b61&p=1

Seth Shostak, "SETI and Intelligent Design" (2005)

http://www.space.com/searchforlife/seti_intelligentdesign_051201.html --- Abstract --- Intelligent Design (ID) proponents often refer to the SETI project as allegedly using a methodology analogous to their search for signs of Intelligence in the universe in general and in the biosphere in particular. They point out that the SETI project has been enjoying support from the scientific community (which is true) and therefore ID must be construed as legitimate as well. In particular, William Dembski has been persistently using such an argument in his ceaseless attempts to confer legitimacy upon his discourse aimed at "proving" that ID is a real scientific theory deserving serious consideration. On this site several contributors (Elsberry, Edis, Perakh, Shallit, and others) have debunked Dembski's numerous publications, including his pseudo-mathematics, and including his use of the SETI example. However, until now the SETI institute's staff has been staying away from the discussion of the alleged similarity of their methodology to ID's approach. In this essay, Seth Shostak of the SETI institute starts from the standpoint of the legitimate SETI approach and shows the lack of substantiation in ID advocates' comparison of their notions to the actual contents of the SETI project. In fact, SETI methodology has nothing in common with the ID advocates' fallacious approach and in a certain sense is contrary to it.

Edna DeVore, "Intelligent Design and Evolution at the White House" (2005)

http://www.space.com/searchforlife/seti_bush_id_050818.html

Rob Moll, "Science that Backs Up Faith" (2005)

"Christianity Today" May 30, 2005: http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2005/122/33.0.html

Ker Than, "Intelligent Design: An Ambiguous Assault on Evolution" (2005)

http://www.livescience.com/humanbiology/050922_ID_main.html

Ker Than, "Intelligent Design: 'The Death of Science'" (2005)

http://www.livescience.com/othernews/050923_ID_science.html

Ker Than, "Intelligent Design: Belief Posing as Theory" (2005)

http://www.livescience.com/othernews/050926_ID_belief.html

Jill Lawrence, "'Intelligent design' ruling may have ripples" (2005)

"USA Today" Posted 12/22/2005 10:08 PM; http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-12-22-intelligent-design_x.htm?POE=NEWISVA

Ken Miller, "An idea that provoked, but didn't deliver" (2005)

"Philadelphia Inquirer" Posted on Sun, Dec. 25, 2005; http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/special_packages/sunday_review/13480975.htm

Tom Bethell, "Banned in biology" (2005)

"The Washington Times" December 26, 2005; http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20051225-105127-3855r.htm

Michael Powell, "Advocates of 'Intelligent Design' Vow to Continue Despite Ruling" (2005)

"The Washington Post" Thursday, December 22, 2005; Page A03; http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/21/AR2005122101959.html

Timothy Sandefur, "Religious Freedom And Other Crimes Against Humanity" (2005)

Talk Reason http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Crimes.cfm

"Intelligent Decision on Inscrutable Design" (2005)

http://scrivenerserror.blogspot.com/2005/12/intelligent-decision-on-inscrutable.html

Albert Alschuler, "The Dover Intelligent Design Decision, Part I: Of Motive, Effect, and History" (2005)

http://uchicagolaw.typepad.com/faculty/2005/12/the_dover_intel.html

Albert Alschuler, "The Dover Intelligent Design Decision, Part II: Of Science and Religion" (2005)

The University of Chicago. The Law School. The Faculty Blog; http://uchicagolaw.typepad.com/faculty/2005/12/the_dover_intel_1.html

Aktualnie nie ma kryteriów wyszukiwania. Dodaj je przy pomocy zakładki 'kryteria'.