Nowości
-
Ker Than, "Intelligent Design: Belief Posing as Theory" (2005)
- http://www.livescience.com/othernews/050926_ID_belief.html
-
Jill Lawrence, "'Intelligent design' ruling may have ripples" (2005)
- "USA Today" Posted 12/22/2005 10:08 PM; http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-12-22-intelligent-design_x.htm?POE=NEWISVA
-
Ken Miller, "An idea that provoked, but didn't deliver" (2005)
- "Philadelphia Inquirer" Posted on Sun, Dec. 25, 2005; http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/special_packages/sunday_review/13480975.htm
-
Tom Bethell, "Banned in biology" (2005)
- "The Washington Times" December 26, 2005; http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20051225-105127-3855r.htm
-
Michael Powell, "Advocates of 'Intelligent Design' Vow to Continue Despite Ruling" (2005)
- "The Washington Post" Thursday, December 22, 2005; Page A03; http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/21/AR2005122101959.html
-
Timothy Sandefur, "Religious Freedom And Other Crimes Against Humanity" (2005)
- Talk Reason http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Crimes.cfm
-
"Intelligent Decision on Inscrutable Design" (2005)
- http://scrivenerserror.blogspot.com/2005/12/intelligent-decision-on-inscrutable.html
-
Albert Alschuler, "The Dover Intelligent Design Decision, Part I: Of Motive, Effect, and History" (2005)
- http://uchicagolaw.typepad.com/faculty/2005/12/the_dover_intel.html
-
Albert Alschuler, "The Dover Intelligent Design Decision, Part II: Of Science and Religion" (2005)
- The University of Chicago. The Law School. The Faculty Blog; http://uchicagolaw.typepad.com/faculty/2005/12/the_dover_intel_1.html
-
Albert Alschuler, "The Dover Intelligent Design Decision, Part III: Compatibility" (2005)
- The University of Chicago. The Law School. The Faculty Blog December 31, 2005; http://uchicagolaw.typepad.com/faculty/2005/12/the_dover_intel_2.html
-
"Scopes Continued" (2005)
- "Daily Phil" UCSD Philosophy Blog; http://philosophy2.ucsd.edu/dailyphil/index.php/2005/12/20/scopes-ii/
-
"Supernatural Causation and the Argument that ID is not a Science" (2005)
- "Daily Phil" UCSD Philosophy Blog; http://philosophy2.ucsd.edu/dailyphil/index.php/2005/12/22/supernatural-causation-and-the-argument-that-id-is-not-a-science/
-
Jonathan Witt, "Dover's Darwinist Judge Rules Against Competing Theory of Intelligent Design" (2005)
- Evolution News & Views, Center for Science & Culture Deember 20, 2005; http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/12/dovers_darwinist_judge_rules_a.html
-
Robert Crowther, "Dover Intelligent Design Decision Criticized as a Futile Attempt to Censor Science Education" (2005)
- Evolution News & Views. Center for Science & Culture, December 20, 2005; http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/12/dover_intelligent_design_decis.html
-
Casey Luskin, "A Visitor’s Guide to the Dover Intelligent Design and Evolution Case" (2005)
- Evolution News & Views. Center for Science & Culture, December 19, 2005; http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/12/a_visitors_guide_to_the_dover.html
-
Jonathan Witt, "Dover Judge Regurgitates Mythological History of Intelligent Design" (2005)
- Evolution News & Views. Center for Science & Culture, December 20, 2005; http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/12/post_6.html
-
Peter Grier and Josh Burek, "Banned in biology class: intelligent design" (2005)
- "The Christian Science Monitor" from the December 21, 2005 edition; http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1221/p01s01-ussc.html
-
"The evolution of creationism" (2005)
- "The Christian Science Monitor" from the October 20, 2005 edition; http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1020/p08s02-comv.html?s=widep
-
Casey Luskin, "Kitzmiller Top Ten" (2005)
- Evolution News & Views. Center for Science & Culture, December 21, 2005; http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/12/judge_jones_hopeless_monster.html
-
Martha Raffaele, "Judge rules `intelligent design' can't be taught in schools" (2005)
- "The Philadelphia Inquirer" Posted on Tue, Dec. 20, 2005; http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/13446369.htm
There are currently no criteria on which to search. Please add them using the 'criteria' tab.