Nowości

"Czy ludzkość mogła zasiedlić Ziemię w krótkim okresie czasu?" (1994)

„Na Początku...” 30 maja 1994, t. II, nr 11 (37), s. 130–131.

Audio

Audycje dźwiękowe

Filmy

 

Kwestia pochodzenia

Film w wersji polskiej (136 238 kB)

Unsolved Mysteries: The Origin of Life

Źródło: http://www.telicthoughts.com/media/snl-originoflife.rm

Dembski-Shermer debate (video)

Is life on Earth the result of a supernatural Creator or Darwinian evolution? Can science prove the existence of God? Is Intelligent Design science? Join the debate between Dr. Michael Shermer, editor in chief of Skeptic magazine and Dr. William Dembski, fellow of the Discovery Institute. The faithful and heretical alike will gain new insight from this fascinating interview. (http://www.audiomartini.com/ 12/07/2005)

Dembski-Shermer debate (audio)

http://www.audiomartini.com/ 12/07/2005 Is life on Earth the result of a supernatural Creator or Darwinian evolution? Can science prove the existence of God? Is Intelligent Design science? Join the debate between Dr. Michael Shermer, editor in chief of Skeptic magazine and Dr. William Dembski, fellow of the Discovery Institute. The faithful and heretical alike will gain new insight from this fascinating interview.

Dembski-Ruse debate

ABC's Nightline, 9 maja 2005. Source: http://telicthoughts.com/?p=65

Stanglewicz

brak opisu

TVN Fakty 2005-02-19

Plik audio

A Rotary Nanomachine - Understanding the Structure and Dynamics of Bacterial Flagella -- Protonic Nanomachine Project, ERATO

Nanotechnology Researchers Network Center of Japan; http://www.nanonet.go.jp/english/mailmag/2004/011a.html

Jiří Kupka

 

28. Marta Cuberbiller, Nierzetelny zarzut nierzetelności (2010)

"Idź pod prąd" lipiec-sierpień 2010, nr 7-8 (72-73), s. 12-13.

G.Chaoputier, J.Seifert, "Ewolucja czy kreacja"

Wywiad Beaty Zubowicz z G. Chapoutierem, J. Seifertem, PlusMinus, 49 (725), sobota-niedziela, 9-10 2006, s. A7, A10, w: Rzeczpospolita, 287 (7581),

Stephen Bartholomew, Jr., "Genetics Proves Absurdity of Whale Evolution" (2021)

In recent years evolutionists have increasingly promoted the evolution of whales as one of the most convincing examples of macroevolution. Their alleged evidence is a mounting number of fossils that they claim are of transitional creatures in this process. In the debate about this subject, creationists have generally focused upon these same creatures, particularly specific details of their anatomy. In essence, the debate boils down to evolutionists explaining why they believe these creatures are ancestors of whales and creationists explaining why they can’t be. Although this issue merits discussion, focusing too much attention upon it is somewhat myopic, for there is another area of investigation that deserves considerably more attention, which is the process that supposedly created these transitional creatures in the first place. This process is the central focus of this paper. Focusing primarily upon genetics, in particular mutations, it demonstrates that the evolutionists’ theory of whale evolution is not only flawed, but absurd. Although evolutionists agree that mutations are instrumental in the process of evolution, they generally include genetic drift, migration, genetic recombination, and natural selection as other contributors to the process. This paper demonstrates exactly why these other processes are all ultimately dependent upon mutations for the changes that are supposedly required. According to evolutionary theory, however, the ultimate initiator of the changes must be not only mutations but very specific mutations, beneficial ones. It will be shown that, according to evolutionists’ own descriptions, beneficial mutations do not create what is absolutely necessary for the process of whale evolution: entirely new physiological features, ones that would require DNA that never before existed.

2021

 

Carl Wieland, "AiG View on the Intelligent Design Movement" (2002)

http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/0830_IDM.asp

2008

 

Michael Le Page, "Evolution myths: Religion and evolution are incompatible" (2008)

New Scientist 16 April, 2008;

Kolejne potwierdzenie kreacjonizmu

Prace biologów z University of California dostarczają kolejnego eleganckiego potwierdzenia przewidywań kreacjonizmu – w tym przypadku degeneratywnego kierunku biologicznej zmiany.

There are currently no criteria on which to search. Please add them using the 'criteria' tab.