Nowości

Mark Hartwig, "The science of design" (2005)

"York Daily Record" Sunday, April 24, 2005; http://ydr.com/story/op-ed/66359/

Mark Hartwig, "The Science of Design" (2005)

TheRealityCheck.org; http://www.therealitycheck.org/GuestColumnist/mhartwig040705.htm; repr. http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2501

Michael Powell, "Doubting Rationalist. 'Intelligent Design' Proponent Phillip Johnson, and How He Came to Be" (2005)

"Washington Post", Sunday, May 15, 2005; D01; http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/14/AR2005051401222.html

Robin Leboe, "[r]evolution" (2005)

http://portal.monkeymovie.com/Articles/94.aspx

H. Allen Orr, "Devolution. Why intelligent design isn't" (2005)

"The New Yorker", Issue of 2005-05-30; http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/050530fa_fact

Casey Luskin, "Refuted Before it was Written: A Guide to Allen Orr's "Devolution" Article in The New Yorker" (2005)

http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1345

Alex Williams, Explaining design away. A review of Darwin and Design by Michael Ruse" (2004)

First published: TJ December 2004, vol. 18, no. 3, s. 31–34; http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v18/i3/darwin.asp

Kyle Alspach, "Design proponents take movement to Web" (2005)

"Science & Theology eNews" May 26, 2005; http://www.stnews.org/articles.php?category=news&article_id=549

Tom Robinson, "Intelligent Design" (2005)

"The Good News" May-June 2005, s. 2 (editorial); http://www.gnmagazine.org/issues/gn58/editorial58.htm

Dan Peterson, "The Little Engine That Could... Undo Darwinism" (2005)

"The American Spectator", June 2005

Kirk Brower, "List of Five Questions on ID, creationism and Christianity" (2005)

Unpublished.

Denyse O'Leary, "National Geographic Cheerleads for Darwin, but Drops the Baton" (2005)

http://www.christianity.ca/faith/weblog/2005/1.07.html

Nick Matzke, "Note to meteorologists: You're next" (2005)

http://www.pandasthumb.org/pt-archives/001046.html --- Summary: In this essay, the author suggests that creationists have singled out evolutionary biology for denial for no objective reasons, as similar (usually fallacious) arguments can be suggested against any other science. As an example, Matzke disusses meteorology, whose concepts are plainly contrary to the Bible's many assertions of God directly causing meteorological phenomena such as rains, floods, and the like. Matzke suggests reasons for creationists's leaving meteorology alone while feverishly assaulting evolutionary biology. This essay has invoked an inordinately prolonged and heated discussion (several hundreds comments posted to the thread on Pandas's Thumb weblog).

Richard Dawkins, "Creationism: God's gift to the ignorant" (2005)

"The Times" May 21, 2005; http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,592-1619264,00.html

Mario Seiglie, "DNA: The Tiny Code That's Toppling Evolution" (2005)

"The Good News" May-June 2005; http://www.gnmagazine.org/issues/gn58/tinycode.htm

Clint Cooper, "Authors say public still holds misconceptions of Scopes trial" (2005)

"Chattanooga Times" May 29, 2005.

Taede Smedes, "A Review of: The Cultures of Creationism: Anti-Evolutionism in English-Speaking Countries. Ed. by Simon Coleman and Leslie Carlin" (2005)

"Ars Disputandi" 2005, vol. 5; http://www.arsdisputandi.org/

George F. Will, "A Debate That Does Not End. The most widely publicized misdemeanor case in American history went to trial 80 years ago this month in Dayton, Tenn." (2005)

"Newsweek" July 4, 2005; http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8358264/site/newsweek/

"Scientists take evolution fight online. National Academies sets up Web site to defend theory" (2005)

Reuters June 10, 2005; http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8174498/

"Nearly Two-thirds of U.S. Adults Believe Human Beings Were Created by God" (press release)

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050706/nyw130.html?.v=17

There are currently no criteria on which to search. Please add them using the 'criteria' tab.