Nowości

Nandagopal R. Menon, "Cardinal reconsiders Darwin remarks. Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, once touted as an ID booster, now says the words he used were too vague" (2005)

"Science & Theology News" December 5, 2005; http://www.stnews.org/rlr-2438.htm

Ashton Nichols, "God before and after Darwin" (2005)

"Science & Theology News" August 19, 2005; http://www.stnews.org/Books-1556.htm

Karl Giberson, "Beyond Copernicus. Religious believers founded modern science, but Darwinian evolution shook these spiritual foundations" (2005)

"Science & Theology News" December 7, 2005; http://www.stnews.org/News-2449.htm

Stephen Barr, Letter (2006)

"First Things" June 2, 2006; http://www.firstthings.com/

Mark Perakh, "Dembski "displaces Darwinism" mathematically -- or does he?" (2005)

Mark Perakh briefly reviews a recent article by William Dembski (http://www.designinference.com/documents/2005.03.Searching_Large_Spaces.pdf) and shows that, contrary to Dembski's claims, it cannot serve as part of the mathematical foundation of intelligent design. Among several serious faults of Demsbki's paper is his view of biological evolution as a search for a small target in a large search space. In fact, biological evolution is not searching for a target. Probabilities calculated by Dembski, for example, for "finding" a specific protein in the space of all possible proteins of a given length are irrelevant because evolution is not "searching" for a predetermined specific protein. Likewise, Dembski's "displacement problem" (which in his new article is in fact not identical to the problem of the same name as rendered by Dembski in his earlier publications) is equally irrelevant for evolution, since the latter conducts no target-oriented searches. --- http://www.talkreason.org/articles/newmath.cfm

Richard A. Wiedenheft, "Evolution vs. Intelligent Design" (2005)

"Bible Advocate" March 2005, vol. 139, No. 2, pp. 4-7; http://www.cog7.org/BA/

Scott Uminsky, "A Review and Evaluation of Mark Perakh's 'Unintelligent Design'" (2005)

http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1309

Ron Strom, "PBS station cancels intelligent-design film" (2005)

WordNetDaily; http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42241

William Dembski, "Is Intelligent Causation Perfectly Natural?" (2005)

http://www.idthefuture.com/index.php?title=is_intelligent_causation_perfectly_natur&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1

David Roach, "Dembski: Intelligent design offers alternative to Darwinism" (2005)

http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=20574

Eric Ryan Telfer, "Who Designed the Designer?: Some Comments regarding Christianity and Various Theories of Intelligent Design"

http://www.geocities.com/e_telfer/WhoDesignedtheDesigner.html

"Cast out from class" (2005)

"Nature" 28 April 2005, vol. 434.

"Natural divisions" (2005)

"Nature" 28 April 2005, vol. 434.

Geoff Brumfiel, "Intelligent design: Who has designs on your students' minds?" (2005)

"Nature" 28 April 2005, vol. 434, s. 1062-1065; http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v434/n7037/full/4341062a.html --- Abstract --- The intelligent-design movement is a small but growing force on US university campuses. For some it bridges the gap between science and faith, for others it goes beyond the pale. Geoff Brumfiel meets the movement's vanguard.

Mark Hartwig, "The science of design" (2005)

"York Daily Record" Sunday, April 24, 2005; http://ydr.com/story/op-ed/66359/

Mark Hartwig, "The Science of Design" (2005)

TheRealityCheck.org; http://www.therealitycheck.org/GuestColumnist/mhartwig040705.htm; repr. http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2501

Michael Powell, "Doubting Rationalist. 'Intelligent Design' Proponent Phillip Johnson, and How He Came to Be" (2005)

"Washington Post", Sunday, May 15, 2005; D01; http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/14/AR2005051401222.html

Robin Leboe, "[r]evolution" (2005)

http://portal.monkeymovie.com/Articles/94.aspx

H. Allen Orr, "Devolution. Why intelligent design isn't" (2005)

"The New Yorker", Issue of 2005-05-30; http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/050530fa_fact

Casey Luskin, "Refuted Before it was Written: A Guide to Allen Orr's "Devolution" Article in The New Yorker" (2005)

http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1345

Aktualnie nie ma kryteriów wyszukiwania. Dodaj je przy pomocy zakładki 'kryteria'.