Witamy w serwisie internetowym Polskiego Towarzystwa Kreacjonistycznego

Diana Gitig, "Evolution meets Judaism" (2005)

"The Scientist" May 23, 2005, vol. 19, issue 10, page 12; http://www.the-scientist.com/2005/5/23/12/2

Home page for tleszczynski

 

Deborah Smith, "Hobbit' just a little man with small brain" (2005)

"The Sydney Morning Herald" February 19, 2005; http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2005/02/18/1108709439138.html?oneclick=true

Mark Earley, "What’s the Big Secret? Intelligent Design in Pennsylvania" (2005)

"BreakPoint" http://www.pfm.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=BreakPoint1&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=16042

Richard Dawkins, "Creationism: God's gift to the ignorant" (2005)

"The Times" May 21, 2005; http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,592-1619264,00.html

Casey Luskin, "Refuted Before it was Written: A Guide to Allen Orr's "Devolution" Article in The New Yorker" (2005)

http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1345

H. Allen Orr, "Devolution. Why intelligent design isn't" (2005)

"The New Yorker", Issue of 2005-05-30; http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/050530fa_fact

Thomas E. Woods, Jr., "How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization" (2005)

http://www.lewrockwell.com/woods/woods40.html

Witold Ryniuk, "Wierzyć czy wiedzieć? Kilka słów o światopoglądzie naukowym" (1997)

http://www.racjonalista.pl/kk.php/s,3978

Nick Matzke, "Note to meteorologists: You're next" (2005)

http://www.pandasthumb.org/pt-archives/001046.html --- Summary: In this essay, the author suggests that creationists have singled out evolutionary biology for denial for no objective reasons, as similar (usually fallacious) arguments can be suggested against any other science. As an example, Matzke disusses meteorology, whose concepts are plainly contrary to the Bible's many assertions of God directly causing meteorological phenomena such as rains, floods, and the like. Matzke suggests reasons for creationists's leaving meteorology alone while feverishly assaulting evolutionary biology. This essay has invoked an inordinately prolonged and heated discussion (several hundreds comments posted to the thread on Pandas's Thumb weblog).

Rodney Stark, "Fact, Fable, and Darwin" (2004)

"One America" September 2004; http://www.taemag.com/issues/articleid.18132/article_detail.asp

Mark Hartwig, "The Science of Design" (2005)

TheRealityCheck.org; http://www.therealitycheck.org/GuestColumnist/mhartwig040705.htm; repr. http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2501

Mark Hartwig, "Darwinists Deny the Obvious" (1996)

"Citizen" June 1996; http://www.family.org/cforum/fosi/origins/essays/a0026703.cfm

Mark Hartwig, "Whose Comfortable Myth?" (2002)

"Focus on the Family" 2002; http://www.family.org/fofmag/pp/a0021018.cfm

Denyse O'Leary, "National Geographic Cheerleads for Darwin, but Drops the Baton" (2005)

http://www.christianity.ca/faith/weblog/2005/1.07.html

Robin Leboe, "[r]evolution" (2005)

http://portal.monkeymovie.com/Articles/94.aspx

John Hanna, "Kansas debate focuses on defining science" (2005)

The Associated Press, May 16, 2005; http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7874967/

"Dealing with design" (2005)

Nature vol. 434, p. 1053 (28 April 2005); http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v434/n7037/full/4341053a.html

"When science meets religion in the classroom" (2005)

"Nature" 19 May 2005, vol. 435, no. 7040, s. 275-276.

"Darwin's evolution theory loses out in mock trial" (2005)

"Hindustan Times" May 16, 2005; http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1363727,0004.htm