Witamy w serwisie internetowym Polskiego Towarzystwa Kreacjonistycznego

"Pennsylvania School District First in US to Offer Alternative to Debunked Darwinian Evolution" (2005)

"LifeSite", January 18, 2005; http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/jan/050118.html

Jim Holt, "Measure for Measure. The strange science of Francis Galton" (2005)

"The New Yorker", The Critics, Books; http://www.newyorker.com/critics/books/?050124crbo_books

John Bohannon, "Are Humans Still Evolving?" (2005)

ScienceNOW 18 January 2005, vol. 118, No. 2; http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org.content.lib.utexas.edu:2048/cgi/content/full/2005/118/2

Bryce DeWitt, "God's Rays" (2005)

"Physics Today"; http://www.aip.org/pt/vol-58/iss-1/p32.html

Deidre Pike,"Evolution Revolution" (2005)

"Citylife" Thursday, February 24, 2005; http://www.lasvegascitylife.com/articles/2005/02/24/cover_story/cover.txt

Roger Trigg, "Darwin 1809-1882" (1999)

z: Roger Trigg, Ideas of Human Nature. An Historical Introduction, Blackwell Publishing 1999 (1st ed. 1988), s. 109-123.

John Baumgardner, "Recent Rapid Uplift of Today's Mountains" (2005)

IMPACT No. 381 March 2005

Mark Perakh, "Beyond suboptimality. Why irreducible complexity does not imply intelligent design" (2005)

Talk Reason; http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Suboptimal.cfm ----------------- Michael Behe's concept of the irreducible complexity (IC) of molecular assemblies in biological cells has been touted by intelligent design (ID) advocates as allegedly strong evidence for ID. In fact, a concept identical in all but name with Behe's IC has been around for a long time before Behe. Professional biologists have overwhelmingly rejected Behe's notion as contrary to the evidence, showing that irreducibly complex molecular systems could have evolved via "Darwinian" evolutionary path with a high likelihood. In this essay Mark Perakh approaches the problem from an angle different from that utilized by biologists. He argues that the notion according to which IC implies ID is contrary to logic. IC systems, by definition, are unreliable, so if they are designed, this points to an inept designer. Perakh further argues that in this case we deal not just with the problem of suboptimal design but with a case where the putative designer delberately designed systems in a way making them easily vulnerable to accidental damage. Perakh concludes that if biological systems are indeed IC this more reasonably can be construed as an argument against inteligent design.

Ronald Jenner, “The Tainting of Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash." (2004)

The Paleontology Newsletter 2004 no. 57, pp. 11-17; http://www.palass.org/pages/archive/News57a.pdf

Chris Mooney, "Survival of the Slickest" (2002)

"The American Prospect" Online, Dec 2, 2002; http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewPrint&articleId=6639

Chris Mooney, "Discovery Phase" (2005)

"The American Prospect" Online, Jan 31, 2005; http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=9125

Chris Mooney, "Intelligent Denials " (2005)

"The American Prospect" Online, Feb 22, 2005; http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=9216

"Textbook disclaimer proposed in Shelby County" (2005)

http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/news/2005/TN/259_textbook_disclaimer_proposed_i_2_21_2005.asp

Simon Singh, "Even Einstein Had His Off Days" (2005)

"The New York Times" January 2, 2005.

Jim Holt, "Unintelligent Design" (2005)

"The New York Times" February 20, 2005 Sunday, Pg. 15.

Werner Gitt, ... a inne religie? (2000)

Christliche Literatur-Verbreitung e.V. Postfach 110135 · 33661 Bielefeld, pierwsze wydanie polskie 2000, ss. 159.

Marcin Gadziński, "Ameryka kłóci się o teorię Darwina" (2004)

"Gazeta Wyborcza" 6 grudnia 2004; http://serwisy.gazeta.pl/swiat/2029020,34254,2427062.html

Matt Inlay, "Bill Dembski and the case of the unsupported assertion" (2005)

Talk Reason; http://www.talkreason.org/articles/unsupported.cfm

Werner Gitt, In the Beginning was Information (1997/2000)

Christliche Literatur-Verbreitung e.V. Postfach 110135 · 33661 Bielefeld, 1st English Edition 1997, 2nd English Edition 2000, stron 256.

Constance Areson Clark, "Evolution for John Doe: Pictures, the Public, and the Scopes Trial Debate" (2001)

"The Journal of American History" March 2001, pp. 1275-1303.