Witamy w serwisie internetowym Polskiego Towarzystwa Kreacjonistycznego

Marcin Ryszkiewicz, "Przyszłość w wykładniczym świecie" (2004)

"Polityka" nr 52/2004 (2485)

Casey Luskin, "A Holiday Truce: A Holocaust Survivor Speaks Out. An Interview with Laura Hillman, and Commentary" (2004)

IDEA Center; http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1281

Richard N. Ostling, "Leading atheist now believes in God, more or less" (2005)

"Science & Theology News" January 2005; http://www.stnews.org/archives/2005_january/news_leading_0105.html

Edwin Bendyk, "System na muszce. Złożone mechanizmy przypominają organizmy żywe" (2005)

"Polityka" Nr 10/2004 (2442); http://polityka.onet.pl/artykul.html?DB=162&ITEM=1152710&#czytaj

Edwin Bendyk, "System na muszce. Złożone mechanizmy przypominają organizmy żywe" (2005)

"Polityka" Nr 10/2004 (2442); http://polityka.onet.pl/artykul.html?DB=162&ITEM=1152710&#czytaj

Julia C. Keller, "Dawkins drops bombs on religion " (2004)

"Science & Theology News" January 2004; http://www.stnews.org/archives/2004/jan04_features.html

Kimberly Roots, "Science and Faith in the Murky Multiverse" (2005)

"Science & Theology News" January 2005; http://www.stnews.org/archives/2005_january/guide_confirm_0105.html ----- beliefnet; http://www.beliefnet.com/story/158/story_15894.html

Robert Wright, "Planet with a Purpose" (2004)

beliefnet; http://www.beliefnet.com/story/153/story_15340.html

Craig Holdrege, "Science as Process or Dogma? The Case of the Peppered Moth" (1999)

"Elemente der Naturwissenschaft" 1999, Bd. 70, ss. 39-51. ----- The Nature Institute, 20 May Hill Road, Ghent, New York 12075, Tel: (518) 672 0116; ----- http://www.natureinstitute.org/txt/ch/moth.htm

Robert Wright, "Moralne zwierzę" (fragmenty książki) (2004)

Robert Wright, Moralne zwierzę, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa, 2004.

Ian Tattersall, "I stał się człowiek. Ewolucja i wyjątkowość człowieka" (fragmenty książki) (2001)

Ian Tattersall, I stał się człowiek. Ewolucja i wyjątkowość człowieka, Wydawnictwo W. A. B., Warszawa, 2001.

"Pennsylvania School District First in US to Offer Alternative to Debunked Darwinian Evolution" (2005)

"LifeSite", January 18, 2005; http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/jan/050118.html

Jim Holt, "Measure for Measure. The strange science of Francis Galton" (2005)

"The New Yorker", The Critics, Books; http://www.newyorker.com/critics/books/?050124crbo_books

John Bohannon, "Are Humans Still Evolving?" (2005)

ScienceNOW 18 January 2005, vol. 118, No. 2; http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org.content.lib.utexas.edu:2048/cgi/content/full/2005/118/2

Bryce DeWitt, "God's Rays" (2005)

"Physics Today"; http://www.aip.org/pt/vol-58/iss-1/p32.html

Deidre Pike,"Evolution Revolution" (2005)

"Citylife" Thursday, February 24, 2005; http://www.lasvegascitylife.com/articles/2005/02/24/cover_story/cover.txt

Roger Trigg, "Darwin 1809-1882" (1999)

z: Roger Trigg, Ideas of Human Nature. An Historical Introduction, Blackwell Publishing 1999 (1st ed. 1988), s. 109-123.

John Baumgardner, "Recent Rapid Uplift of Today's Mountains" (2005)

IMPACT No. 381 March 2005

Mark Perakh, "Beyond suboptimality. Why irreducible complexity does not imply intelligent design" (2005)

Talk Reason; http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Suboptimal.cfm ----------------- Michael Behe's concept of the irreducible complexity (IC) of molecular assemblies in biological cells has been touted by intelligent design (ID) advocates as allegedly strong evidence for ID. In fact, a concept identical in all but name with Behe's IC has been around for a long time before Behe. Professional biologists have overwhelmingly rejected Behe's notion as contrary to the evidence, showing that irreducibly complex molecular systems could have evolved via "Darwinian" evolutionary path with a high likelihood. In this essay Mark Perakh approaches the problem from an angle different from that utilized by biologists. He argues that the notion according to which IC implies ID is contrary to logic. IC systems, by definition, are unreliable, so if they are designed, this points to an inept designer. Perakh further argues that in this case we deal not just with the problem of suboptimal design but with a case where the putative designer delberately designed systems in a way making them easily vulnerable to accidental damage. Perakh concludes that if biological systems are indeed IC this more reasonably can be construed as an argument against inteligent design.

Ronald Jenner, “The Tainting of Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash." (2004)

The Paleontology Newsletter 2004 no. 57, pp. 11-17; http://www.palass.org/pages/archive/News57a.pdf