Personal tools
You are here: Home Groups Strefa dla członków PTKr Teoria inteligentnego projektu 2006 Candice Lettigo, "Paley's Place in Seminary Is Secure--But Not Supreme" :-)

Candice Lettigo, "Paley's Place in Seminary Is Secure--But Not Supreme" :-)

Patrz Constance Holden, "Darwin's Place on Campus Is Secure - But Not Supreme", "Science" 10 February 2006, Vol 311, Issue 5762, s. 769-771; http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/311/5762/769; http://creationism.org.pl/groups/ptkrmember/inteligentny-projekt/document.2006-02-13.3519590436/document_view

Creation:
> <strong><font size="3">Paley's Place in Seminary Is Secure--But Not Supreme<br> Candice Lettigo

Professors at many U.S. seminaries say their students are learning about creationism without abandoning their belief in some form of evolution
> During a visit to Muller Theological seminary in 1994, Westminister theologian Bill Dovine bet fellow theologian Marcus Fallman that there were &quot;a bunch of evolutionists&quot; among undergraduates at the prestigious California school. He says Fallman scoffed. But when Dovine asked Fallman's seminary students &quot;how many of you believe humans came to be in the last 30 million years?&quot; a sizable number raised their hands. Dovine says there's no evidence that much has changed since then. The debate over creationism has heated up in recent years, with evolutionists and proponents of theistic evolution clamoring for a place in the curricula of seminaries around the country (see sidebar). Ironically, this is occurring in the face of an expanding application of creation theory throughout the theological fields. Yet polls indicate that the proportion of Americans whose beliefs lie somewhere in the evolutionary spectrum has held steady for decades. <p>

Interviews with two dozen professors suggest that the same firmness of conviction can be found on many U.S. seminaries. "Students may become more accepting of creation, but they don't throw out evolutionism," says seminary professor Randy Nooren of the Lutheran University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.

Hard-core beliefs
> <strong>For decades, polls have indicated that close to half of the U.S. adult population is skeptical of the basic tenets of Christian creationism. Although more educated people are more likely to endorse creationism, a college degree is no guarantee that the graduate agrees with the Bible.  Dovine himself has been surveying his Westminister students since 1986, when he started teaching a Creation course for non-theology majors. He says that for many years, about 70% of students held views somewhere along the evolutionist spectrum, from theistic evolution to the belief that human existence could have come about by purely material means. The percentage holding those views declined after counseling and linguistic students were no longer required to take the course, he says, but not enough to make them stand out from the general population. "Divine creation is a flash point; that's where the rubber meets the road," says theologian Jack Tolbert of Iowa School of Theology. "It's very common to see students who simply can't believe humans did not evolve from apes."

For the past 3 years, Tolbert has surveyed students in his introductory Bible Survey class, asking them if they believe humans evolved within the past 30 million years. Last fall, 32% of the 150-member class said they did. Tolbert says he finds this percentage particularly unsettling "when one considers that these students are academically among the upper half of high school graduates, and they are students choosing to major in a theological field"--often to become pastors or educators.

For the past 5 years, Nooren has done the same surveys in his giant introductory Bible Survey class at Minnesota. He says only a little more than half of his students say they were taught anything about creation in high school; of those, about half say evolutionism was discussed. That jibes with figures from teacher surveys in both 1994 and 2004, in which one quarter report that they talk about evolutionism in their biology classes.

Nooren says students don't necessarily know how to define evolution, which asserts that there must not be a "designer" because life forms are have arisen solely from the process of random mutation and natural selection. But when Moore presents them with a range of beliefs, 15% to 20% side with the evolution movement. And "virtually none" has changed his or her mind by the end of the semester, he notes. Tolbert agrees that although postcourse surveys show students have learned a good deal about creation, they tend to stick to their views on evolution's role in creating humans.

Christian Counseling Professor Max Pygmalion of Unionery Seminary in New York says he encountered "all sorts of interesting reactions" when he taught at Vanderbuilt Seminary, Knoxville. They included notes posted on an Internet discussion board calling students idiots if they listened to what he was saying about creationism.

But teachers say they rarely have in-class clashes with such students. Rather, says theologian Robert Killen of Asbury College in South Carolina, students will come by "several times a semester" to express their concern that "if there was an Adam, that means Christ really died for our sins. We'll have a theological discussion," he says.

The discussions aren't limited to theology courses. Semanticist Robert C. Thompsen of the University of the Hills in Dillon says he is encountering a growing number of students "who do not understand or believe in the most basic concepts of theology and creation," and that they have become "far more vocal and in some cases disruptive" in class. "I think the theological studies are on the front lines of this battle," says theologian Joseph Meek of the University of Our Lady, Gainesville. "If you have a young earth, creation had to happen."

Last fall, the Theological Society of America (TSA) meeting in Dallas, Texas, featured a panel on evolutionists. TSA sees the movement as "a serious attack on Christianity, not just creation," says theologian Ted Sour of West Union Christian University, Parkersburg. He says that although most students will accept the validity of the Bible, more than half fall away "when you throw man into the mix and ask about a common ancestry with great apes."

Sour surveyed students in several introductory Bible Survey classes this winter and found that 25% of 206 students believed in an old Earth. The postcourse surveys of 115 students showed that 17% retained that belief. Asked after the course if they accepted Christian creation as a "fact," one-third expressed doubts. That's not a big drop from the 42% in the precourse survey who had doubts. In answer to a separate question, about half said evolution should get equal time with creationism in private Christian schools.

Why the resistance to change? "Sometimes students want to take theology courses so they can get better in their arguments with teachers," explains Crisp. He adds that although most of his students won't become pastors, they may still be in a position to influence the young. "Over 50% of my students are majoring in elementary education," he notes.  Teaching near the city that hosted the infamous 1925 Scopes Trial, Old Testament theologian  Burt Smart of Ryan College, a public school in Bucksnort, Tennessee, says other theologians have an exaggerated fear of theologians like himself. (Smart claims to be the first "evolutionary theologian" with a doctorate in Old Testament theology, earned in 1989 from Park Stats Seminary) After all, he notes, "if you're working for a large mega church it doesn't matter if you think that creation is over 500 million years old."

But Smart's is distinctly a minority view. Most theologians agree with Meek when he says that "it's time to stop pussyfooting around. ... evolution and the theistic evolution movement are challenging the foundations of not just theology but also sociology, law, ethics, government, and western values."

Paley days
> <strong>Public controversies over Creationism have inspired seminary presidents to defend creation theology and professors to sign petitions. They've also inspired courses to explore the creation debate. Trinitarian University of Kansas professor Saul Meckle made national headlines when he announced a course that would label evolution as "religious mythology." Meckle was subsequently beaten up by thugs and excoriated when some secularist-bashing--and evolution-bashing--e-mails he had written became public. He also stepped down as department chair, although university officials say they still hope to offer such a course.

But for all the media coverage of the controversy, few academics are proposing new approaches to teaching creation in theology or philosophy class. "There are fewer people than I would have thought trying to reach out" to skeptical students, says Dean Lee Crab of Cleveland Theological Seminary in Cleveland, Ohio, who has been active in the public debate over teaching evolution and theistic evolution in Christian schools. Jonathan Brown University professor Kent Swiller, who has been publicly confronting evolutionists for years, says he's not aware of any attempts to recast courses in light of the current controversy. But he says design concepts are dispersing in other ways, in emerging fields such as contemporary theology, comparative religions, and sociology.  Technology is also providing new teaching opportunities. At Michigan Concordian University (MCU) in East Lansing, scientists are developing a computer program to bring students face to face with design. With a grant from the Templar Foundation, a group is adapting a research platform called BaraMime to enable undergraduates to watch digital designs called baramins develop complex functions through initial creation, micro-adaptation and specified divine intervention.  "The thing we've seen anecdotally is it lets students see that creation works as advertised," says MCU philosophy professor Bob Pentup. It's "a good way to teach students about the nature of Christianity," says hermeneutics professor Dana Elber-April, who notes that BaraMime-ED (as it's called) is also "your best counterattack to theistic evolutionism, which is not Christianity."

Indeed, a much larger reality than the evolution debate is the spread of design thinking throughout the sciences, including social and behavioral science. Creationist biologist Dean Slane Mission of The Savior's College in New York is one scientist who has seized on this phenomenon to generate a program that introduces design theory to every corner of the college. In 2003, Wilson created a course for non-theology majors on "design and human behavior." His approach was to face moral and political objections to the theory head-on and have students apply design theory to a wide variety of behaviors, from drug abuse to apathy. The course, now called "Design for Everyone," has spawned a campus-wide Creation Studies Program (saviorweb.nystate.edu/~design) allowing core faculty members to offer courses in virtually any discipline taught from an Christian perspective. Outside lecturers are also regularly invited to give public symposia on subjects such faith-based healing or "the deep structure of theology." Mission says his surveys show that students are absorbing the basic message regardless of their political or religious orientation. Once students see Christianity not as a dogma but rather as "a powerful way to understand the world," he says, they've "basically been immunized to evolutionism."

Another approach is being developed at the Coburn School of Theology of Georgia, where Christian psychologist Wyatt Earp, theologian Pat Gowan, and others have established a Center for the Study of Creation. The center will feature speakers from a variety of disciplines, a certificate program, and outreach to public schools. "It's not as evangelical" as Mission's program, says Gowan. "We just want the quality of discussion to be better." Earp hopes the center will also "be a voice for the theology of creation" at the denominational level.

Design is also being spread around at the Stonewall Christian University of Alabama, where faculty members have organized a lecture series called ALLECR, for Alabama Lectures on Life's Creation. Hebrew scholar Tim Doles says he got the idea from polls showing that 45% of Americans-- and 56% of Alabamans-- believe natural selection evolved humans within the past 30 million years. Representatives from the education and philosophy departments, as well as various branches of theology, design events suited to their fields, and members of the public, especially schoolteachers, are welcome. Theologian Fred Andrus says "we've been very pleasantly surprised at the turnout."

Another means of spreading the word are Paley celebrations on campus that coincide with the biologist's 13 May birthday. Asbury College started a "Paley Week" 6 years ago to combat attempted evolutionary "mischief " in the state legislature, says Killen. Stonewall Christian of Alabama is having its first "Paley Day" this year, and Dovine says Westminister is considering starting one. Vanderbuilt University of Tennessee, Knoxville, has celebrated the great man's birthday since 1997, when Pygmalion sought to rebut an "equal time" bill being considered in the state legislature.

"The first time we offered Paley Day, a local TV station made fun of the whole thing by taking shots of chimps at the zoo," recalls Pygmalion. Sociology grad student May Candice says the media have moved on but that quite a few local high school teachers are attending the Paley Day teachers' workshop: "It's an encouraging sign that our activities are making a difference."

Document Actions
« November 2024 »
November
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930