Narzędzia osobiste
Jesteś w: Start Members admin's Home Nowości

Nowości

Document Casey Luskin, "Is evolution anti-religious?" (2005)
Response to ACLU ID FAQ: Part 5; http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1292
Document Casey Luskin, "Is evolution education important?" (2005)
Response to ACLU ID FAQ: Part 7; http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1294
Document Deidre Pike, "Evolution Revolution" (2005)
Tuckson Weekly February 17, 2005; http://www.tucsonweekly.com/gbase/Currents/Content?oid=oid:65975
Document Matt Inlay, "Bill Dembski and the case of the unsupported assertion" (2005)
Talk Reason; http://www.talkreason.org/articles/unsupported.cfm
Document Jim Holt, "Unintelligent Design" (2005)
"The New York Times" February 20, 2005 Sunday, Pg. 15.
Document Chris Mooney, "Discovery Phase" (2005)
"The American Prospect" Online, Jan 31, 2005; http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=9125
Document Chris Mooney, "Intelligent Denials " (2005)
"The American Prospect" Online, Feb 22, 2005; http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=9216
Document Mark Perakh, "Beyond suboptimality. Why irreducible complexity does not imply intelligent design" (2005)
Talk Reason; http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Suboptimal.cfm ----------------- Michael Behe's concept of the irreducible complexity (IC) of molecular assemblies in biological cells has been touted by intelligent design (ID) advocates as allegedly strong evidence for ID. In fact, a concept identical in all but name with Behe's IC has been around for a long time before Behe. Professional biologists have overwhelmingly rejected Behe's notion as contrary to the evidence, showing that irreducibly complex molecular systems could have evolved via "Darwinian" evolutionary path with a high likelihood. In this essay Mark Perakh approaches the problem from an angle different from that utilized by biologists. He argues that the notion according to which IC implies ID is contrary to logic. IC systems, by definition, are unreliable, so if they are designed, this points to an inept designer. Perakh further argues that in this case we deal not just with the problem of suboptimal design but with a case where the putative designer delberately designed systems in a way making them easily vulnerable to accidental damage. Perakh concludes that if biological systems are indeed IC this more reasonably can be construed as an argument against inteligent design.
Document Richard Gallagher, "Intelligent Design and Informed Debate" (2005)
"The Scientist" Feb. 28, 2005, Volume 19, Issue 4; http://www.the-scientist.com/2005/2/28/6/1
Document Graciella Flores, "Journals and inteligent design" (2005)
"The Scientist", Feb. 28, 2005, Volume 19, Issue 4; http://www.the-scientist.com/2005/2/28/12/1
Document Suzanne Goldenberg, "Religious right fights science for the heart of America" (2005)
"The Guardian" February 7, 2005; http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1407171,00.html
Document Charles Colson, "Teach the Controversy: The Intelligent Design in Schools" (2005)
BreakPoint with Charles Colson. Commentary #050303 - 03/03/2005
Document David Berlinski, "There are valid criticisms of evolution" (2005)
"The Wichita Eagle"; http://www.kansas.com/mld/eagle/news/editorial/11083843.htm Pełna wersja: http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2450&prog
Document "US scientists battle over challenge to Darwinism" (2005)
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200503/s1317005.htm
Document "Review of: William Dembski, Michael Ruse (eds.), Debating Design" (2005)
"Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews"; http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=2061
Document Stephen C. Meyer, "The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories" (2004)
"Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington" 2004, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 213-239; http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2177 --- STATEMENT FROM THE COUNCIL OF THE BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON --- BSW repudiates Meyer --- Huge Response to Samizdat Article the Darwinists Tried to Suppress
Document Michael J. Everhart, "Criticisms of evolution aren't based on science" (2005)
"The Wichita Eagle" March 15, 2005; http://www.kansas.com/mld/eagle/news/editorial/11135418.htm
Document Gabriele Veneziano, "Mit początku czasu" (2004)
"Świat Nauki" czerwiec 2004; http://www.swiatnauki.pl/?q=art&n=200406a
Document Jan Such, "Rozwój Wszechświata w ujęciu kosmologicznym oraz filozoficznym" (2001)
w: Krzysztof Łastowski, Paweł Zeidler (red.), Zaproszenie do filozofii. Wykłady z filozofii dla młodzieży, Wydawnictwo Humaniora, Poznań 2001, ss. 9-18; http://www.staff.amu.edu.pl/%7Einsfil/mlodziez/such.htm
Document "Na mojej planecie nie ma życia. Z profesorem Aleksandrem Wolszczanem rozmawia Marcin Żebrowski" (2005)
"Gość Niedzielny"; http://wiadomosci.wp.pl/kat,33714,wid,8087941,wiadomosc.html#

Aktualnie nie ma kryteriów wyszukiwania. Dodaj je przy pomocy zakładki 'kryteria'.

Akcje Dokumentu
« Lipiec 2025 »
Lipiec
PnWtŚrCzPtSbNd
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031