Witamy w serwisie internetowym Polskiego Towarzystwa Kreacjonistycznego

Paul S.L. Johnson, Stworzenie (1938)

Paul S.L. Johnson, Epifaniczne wykłady Pisma Świętego, t. II. Stworzenie, Philadelphia, P.A., USA 1938, stron 225.

Richard A. Wiedenheft, "Evolution vs. Intelligent Design" (2005)

"Bible Advocate" March 2005, vol. 139, No. 2, pp. 4-7; http://www.cog7.org/BA/

Paweł Siwek "Ewolucjonizm w świetle nauki"

Pełna wersja książki w formacie DjVu (http://je.pl/2fk5)

Susan J. Lolle, Jennifer L. Victor, Jessica M. Young & Robert E. Pruitt, "Genome-wide non-mendelian inheritance of extra-genomic information in Arabidopsis" (2005)

"Nature" 24 March 2005, vol. 434, pp. 505-509; www.nature.com/nature. --- Abstract: --- A fundamental tenet of classical mendelian genetics is that allelic information is stably inherited from one generation to the next, resulting in predictable segregation patterns of differing alleles. Although several exceptions to this principle are known, all represent specialized cases that are mechanistically restricted to either a limited set of specific genes (for example mating type conversion in yeast) or specific types of alleles (for example alleles containing transposons3 or repeated sequences). Here we show that Arabidopsis plants homozygous for recessive mutant alleles of the organ fusion gene HOTHEAD5 (HTH) can inherit allele-specific DNA sequence information that was not present in the chromosomal genome of their parents but was present in previous generations. This previously undescribed process is shown to occur at all DNA sequence polymorphisms examined and therefore seems to be a general mechanism for extragenomic inheritance of DNA sequence information.We postulate that these genetic restoration events are the result of a template-directed process that makes use of an ancestral RNA-sequence cache. --- Omówienie w języku polskim: http://je.pl/geat --- Komentarz Jonathana Wellsa: http://je.pl/8lk4

John Ankerberg and John Weldon, "Truth in Advertising: Damaging the Cause of Science"

http://www.johnankerberg.com/Articles/science/SC0104W1E.htm

John Ankerberg and John Weldon, "Evolution, Logic and Increasing Doubts"

http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/science/SC0104W2A.htm

Frank Close, "The Quantum Universe" (2005)

Nature, 24 March 2005, vol. 434, s. 438-439; a review of "Science and Ultimate Reality: Quantum Theory, Cosmology and Complexity" edited by John D. Barrow, Paul C.W. Daview & Charles L. Harper, Jr, Cambridge University Press 2004.

David Limbaugh, "Slamming Intelligent Design" (2004)

DavidLimbaugh.com; http://www.davidlimbaugh.com/mt/archives/2004/12/slamming_intell.html#more

Krzysztof Zbytniewski, "Kosmiczny ksiądz i Marsjanie" (2004)

16 stycznia 2004; wywiad z Michałem Hellerem. Początek: "O tym, czy jesteśmy w Kosmosie sami, czy Jezus umarł także za grzechy kosmitów, i czego powinny uczyć się o stworzeniu świata dzieci, opowiada nam wybitny kosmolog, fizyk i filozof ksiądz profesor Michał Heller."

Christian C. Carman, "The electrons of the dinosaurs and the center of the Earth: comments on D.D. Turner's 'The past vs. the tiny: historical science and the abductive arguments for realism'" (2005)

"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science" 2005, vol. 36, pp. 171–173. --- Abstract: --- Turner [The past vs. the tiny: Historical science and the abductive arguments for realism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35A (2004) 1] claims that the arguments in favor of realism do not support with the same force both classes of realism, since they supply stronger reasons for experimental realism than for historical realism. I would like to make two comments, which should be seen as amplifications inspired by his proposal, rather than as a criticism. First, it is important to highlight that Turner's distinction between 'tiny' and 'past unobservables' is neither excluding nor exhaustive. Second, even if we agreed with everything that Turner says regarding the arguments for realism and their relative weight in order to justify the experimental or historical version, there is an aspect that Turner does not consider and that renders historical realism less problematic than experimental realism.

Derek D. Turner, "The past vs. the tiny: historical science and the abductive arguments for realism" (2004)

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2004, vol. 35, pp. 1–17. --- Abstract --- Scientific realism is fundamentally a view about unobservable things, events, processes, and so on, but things can be unobservable either because they are tiny or because they are past. The familiar abductive arguments for scientific realism lend more justification to scientific realism about the tiny than to realism about the past. This paper examines both the ‘‘basic’’ abductive arguments for realism advanced by philosophers such as Ian Hacking and Michael Devitt, as well as Richard Boyd’s version of the inference to the best explanation of the success of science, and shows that these arguments provide less support to historical than to experimental realism. This is because unobservably tiny things can function both as unifiers of the phenomena and as tools for the production of new phenomena, whereas things in the past can only serve as unifiers of the phenomena. The upshot is that realists must not suppose that by presenting arguments for experimental realism they have thereby defended realism in general.

J.T. Trevors, D.L. Abel, "Chance and necessity do not explain the origin of life" (2004)

Cell Biology International 2004, vol. 28, pp. 729-739. --- Abstract. --- Where and how did the complex genetic instruction set programmed into DNA come into existence? The genetic set may have arisen elsewhere and was transported to the Earth. If not, it arose on the Earth, and became the genetic code in a previous lifeless, physicalechemical world. Even if RNA or DNA were inserted into a lifeless world, they would not contain any genetic instructions unless each nucleotide selection in the sequence was programmed for function. Even then, a predetermined communication system would have had to be in place for any message to be understood at the destination. Transcription and translation would not necessarily have been needed in an RNA world. Ribozymes could have accomplished some of the simpler functions of current protein enzymes. Templating of single RNA strands followed by retemplating back to a sense strand could have occurred. But this process does not explain the derivation of ‘‘sense’’ in any strand. ‘‘Sense’’ means algorithmic function achieved through sequences of certain decision-node switch-settings. These particular primary structures determine secondary and tertiary structures. Each sequence determines minimum-free-energy folding propensities, binding site specificity, and function. Minimal metabolism would be needed for cells to be capable of growth and division. All known metabolism is cybernetic e that is, it is programmatically and algorithmically organized and controlled.

Błędy logiczne ewolucjonistów

 

Evolution, Logic and Increasing Doubts

"Evolution, Logic and Increasing Doubts" by Dr. John Ankerberg and Dr. John Weldon (opis błędów logicznych ewolucjonistów)

Paul Stokes, "Staff and parents fight to stop takeover by academy that teaches 'creationism'" (2004)

telegraph.co.uk Monday 21/06/2004; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/main.jhtml?xml=/education/2004/06/23/tenedu221.xml

"How Did Life Begin? An Interview with Andy Knoll" (2004)

NOVA http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/origins/knoll.html

"New Theory Of How Planets Form Finds Havens Of Stability Amid Turbulence" (2005)

"Science Daily" 2005-03-19 Source: Indiana University http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/03/050309144659.htm

Cornelia Dean, "A New Screen Test for Imax: It's the Bible vs. the Volcano" (2005)

"The New York Times" March 19, 2005; http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/19/national/19imax.html?

Maggie McKee, "Genes contribute to religious inclination" (2005)

"New Scientist" 17:38 16 March 2005; http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7147

Mark Perakh, "Dembski "displaces Darwinism" mathematically -- or does he?" (2005)

Mark Perakh briefly reviews a recent article by William Dembski (http://www.designinference.com/documents/2005.03.Searching_Large_Spaces.pdf) and shows that, contrary to Dembski's claims, it cannot serve as part of the mathematical foundation of intelligent design. Among several serious faults of Demsbki's paper is his view of biological evolution as a search for a small target in a large search space. In fact, biological evolution is not searching for a target. Probabilities calculated by Dembski, for example, for "finding" a specific protein in the space of all possible proteins of a given length are irrelevant because evolution is not "searching" for a predetermined specific protein. Likewise, Dembski's "displacement problem" (which in his new article is in fact not identical to the problem of the same name as rendered by Dembski in his earlier publications) is equally irrelevant for evolution, since the latter conducts no target-oriented searches. --- http://www.talkreason.org/articles/newmath.cfm