Witamy w serwisie internetowym Polskiego Towarzystwa Kreacjonistycznego

William Jennings Bryan, "God and Evolution" (1922) pdf

"The New York Times" 26 February 1922, Section 7, 1: 6–9, 11: 1; http://www.ucl.ac.uk/sts/cain/texts/bryan/bryan.pdf

John R. Baumgardner, Andrew A. Snelling, Russell D. Humphreys, Steven A. Austin, "Measurable 14C in Fossilized Organic Materials: Confirming the Young Earth Creation-Flood Model" (2003) pdf

w: Robert L. Ivey, Jr. (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Creationism, held August 4-9, 2003, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania USA, Creation Science Fellowship, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA 2003, s. 127-142.

Jakub Kwintkiewicz, "Ruchome elementy genetyczne" (2001)

"Nowiny Lekarskie" 2001, t. 70, nr 8, s. 940–947.

J.B.S.Haldane, "The Cost of Natural Selection" (1957) pdf

"Journal of Genetics" 1957, vol. 55, s. 511-524, http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/ridley/classictexts/haldane2.pdf

George Ellis, "Physics ain't what it used to be" (2005)

Book reviewed - The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion f Intelligent Design by Leonard Susskind, "Nature" 8 December 2005, vol. 438, s. 739-740.

"Similar stem cells in insect and human gut" (2005)

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-12/ci-ssc120605.php

Carl T. Hall, "Man's best friend shares most genes with humans. Full genome sequence to be published today" (2005)

"San Francisco Chronicle" Thursday, December 8, 2005; http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/12/08/MNG75G4GLM1.DTL

Dembski-Shermer debate (audio)

http://www.audiomartini.com/ 12/07/2005 Is life on Earth the result of a supernatural Creator or Darwinian evolution? Can science prove the existence of God? Is Intelligent Design science? Join the debate between Dr. Michael Shermer, editor in chief of Skeptic magazine and Dr. William Dembski, fellow of the Discovery Institute. The faithful and heretical alike will gain new insight from this fascinating interview.

Don A. Howard, "Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science" (2005)

"Physics Today" http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-58/iss-12/p34.html

"Ślady stóp czy tylko popiół" (2005)

"Rzeczpospolita" 06.12.05 Nr 284; http://www.rzeczpospolita.pl/gazeta/wydanie_051206/nauka/nauka_a_6.html

Alvin Plantinga, On fundamentalist

Alvin Plantinga, Warranted Christian Belief (Oxford: 2000), pg. 245.

Laurie Goodstein, "Intelligent Design Might Be Meeting Its Maker" (2005)

"The New York Times" December 4, 2005; http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/04/weekinreview/04good.html

Ker Than, "Anti-evolution Attacks on the Rise" (2005)

http://www.livescience.com/othernews/050927_ID_cases.html

Ker Than, "Intelligent Design: Belief Posing as Theory" (2005)

http://www.livescience.com/othernews/050926_ID_belief.html

Ker Than, "Intelligent Design: 'The Death of Science'" (2005)

http://www.livescience.com/othernews/050923_ID_science.html

Ker Than, "Intelligent Design: An Ambiguous Assault on Evolution" (2005)

http://www.livescience.com/humanbiology/050922_ID_main.html

Edna Devore, "Teach Evolution: Leave No Child Behind " (2005)

http://www.space.com/searchforlife/seti_devore_evolution_050210.html

Rob Moll, "Science that Backs Up Faith" (2005)

"Christianity Today" May 30, 2005: http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2005/122/33.0.html

Edna DeVore, "Intelligent Design and Evolution at the White House" (2005)

http://www.space.com/searchforlife/seti_bush_id_050818.html

Seth Shostak, "SETI and Intelligent Design" (2005)

http://www.space.com/searchforlife/seti_intelligentdesign_051201.html --- Abstract --- Intelligent Design (ID) proponents often refer to the SETI project as allegedly using a methodology analogous to their search for signs of Intelligence in the universe in general and in the biosphere in particular. They point out that the SETI project has been enjoying support from the scientific community (which is true) and therefore ID must be construed as legitimate as well. In particular, William Dembski has been persistently using such an argument in his ceaseless attempts to confer legitimacy upon his discourse aimed at "proving" that ID is a real scientific theory deserving serious consideration. On this site several contributors (Elsberry, Edis, Perakh, Shallit, and others) have debunked Dembski's numerous publications, including his pseudo-mathematics, and including his use of the SETI example. However, until now the SETI institute's staff has been staying away from the discussion of the alleged similarity of their methodology to ID's approach. In this essay, Seth Shostak of the SETI institute starts from the standpoint of the legitimate SETI approach and shows the lack of substantiation in ID advocates' comparison of their notions to the actual contents of the SETI project. In fact, SETI methodology has nothing in common with the ID advocates' fallacious approach and in a certain sense is contrary to it.