Robert William Goodrich, "The Political Selection of Ideology [a review of: Richard Weikart, Socialist Darwinism: Evolution in German Socialist Thought from Marx to Bernstein, International Scholars Publications, Bethesda, Md. 1998]" (2001)
H-NET BOOK REVIEW, published by H-Ideas (March, 2001); http://h-net.msu.edu/cgi-bin/logbrowse.pl?trx=vx&list=h-german&month=0103&week=d&msg=YN6k/gk8ZOdzqXT1WUcMuA&user=&pw=
H-NET BOOK REVIEW
>
Published by H-Ideas (March, 2001)<br>
>
Richard Weikart. <strong>Socialist Darwinism: Evolution in German Socialist Thought<br>
from Marx to Bernstein. Bethesda, Md: International Scholars Publications,
>
1998. x + 257 pp. Notes, bibliography, index. $74.95 (cloth), ISBN<br>
1-57308-290-8.
>
<br>
Reviewed by Robert William Goodrich, Department of Philosophy, Religion,
>
and History, Augustana College.<br>
>
The Political Selection of Ideology<br>
>
In the nineteenth century, Karl Marx and Charles Darwin unleashed a torrent<br>
of scientific and social controversy that has yet to recede fully. Both
>
men's theories challenged the political, social, scientific, and moral<br>
ordering of society. Yet, neither man could control his legacy. Darwin's
>
ideas were bastardized and popularly misunderstood as Social Darwinism,<br>
while the ever-sensitive Marx was so distraught over the corruption of his
>
ideas that he once commented that he was not a Marxist. Indeed, their fates<br>
were intertwined in more ways than one, for social theorists looked to
>
science for legitimacy. Socialist theoreticians in particular prided<br>
themselves on their broad reading and scientific methodology.
>
<br>
Exploring just one overlap of scientific and social theory, Richard Weikart
>
presents a rich intellectual history of prominent German socialist<br>
theorists' reception of Darwinism in the nineteenth century. With each
>
chapter organized around an individual theoretician, Weikart's work wades<br>
through an impressive array of primary source material including published
>
books, articles, speech manuscripts, and some previously unknown<br>
correspondences to reveal a heterogeneous, inconsistent, and dynamic
>
relationship between German socialists and contemporary science. Indeed,<br>
Weikart's main thesis claims, "The German socialists' reception of
>
evolutionary theory illustrates the mutual interpretation of scientific and<br>
social thought" and "Social theory dictated the extent to which Darwinism
>
was accepted in socialist circles" (pp. 2-3).<br>
>
First and foremost, Weikart sets out to explore the "interconnectedness of<br>
scientific and social thought" (p. 223), specifically the impact of
>
Darwinism on socialist revisionism. Weikart asks, did the gradualist<br>
evolution in Darwin's theory of nature inform an evolutionary view of
>
socialism in opposition to a revolutionary theory? Alongside this central<br>
theme, Weikart includes a chapter on "The Role of Biologists" and engages
>
in brief forays into Darwinism's effect on socialism's view of eugenics,<br>
race, and religion, all of which provide tantalizing introductions into the
>
breadth of evolutionary and Social Darwinistic thought at all levels of<br>
socialist theory -- a phenomenon many prefer to relegate to the German Right.
>
<br>
By the phrase "socialist Darwinism," Weikart consciously distances the
>
integration of Darwinism into socialist thought from the more widely used<br>
Social Darwinism. And here is one of Weikart's consistently illuminated
>
arguments -- that leading socialists did not accept the direct application<br>
of Darwinism to society; rather, based on the uniqueness of man, they
>
separated Darwin's natural theory from socialist social theory. Indeed, the<br>
inability to reconcile the two led many leaders to embrace non-Darwinian
>
evolutionary theories. For this argument, Weikart presents a complex<br>
constellation of ideologies: Marxist (Marx, Engels, Bebel, Bernstein, and a
>
mature Kautsky) and non-Marxist (Lange, Buechner, Dodel, the young Kautsky)<br>
socialism; Darwinian and non-Darwinian (especially Tremaux and Lamarck)
>
evolutionary theory; and non-socialist proponents and opponents of various<br>
strands of evolutionary theory. In this confusing intellectual maelstrom,
>
it is not surprising, as Weikart reveals, that Marxists, including Marx,<br>
proved inconsistent.
>
<br>
Weikart avoids the temptation of a theoretical teleology that culminated in
>
the abandonment of revolutionary principles first in the war crisis of 1914<br>
and later in the Bad Godesberg Program of 1959. Instead, Weikart reveals
>
the "ambiguous relationship" (p. 221) of German socialism to Darwinism. The<br>
inconsistent and even contradictory approach to the increasingly popular
>
and popularized theories of natural selection appears on every page. The<br>
rich correspondence between intellectual and political leaders exposes the
>
tension and uncertainty towards Darwinism that lay beneath the common<br>
perception of a homogeneously positive reception by socialists.
>
<br>
The men (and there are only men) whose ideas fill the pages are all
>
well-known to any historian of the nineteenth century: Karl Marx, Friedrich<br>
Engels, Friedrich Albert Lange, Ludwig Buechner, August Bebel, Karl
>
Kautsky, and Eduard Bernstein. And one might initially be inclined to think<br>
that Weikart travels a well-worn path. Weikart's strength, however, is to
>
bring new sources and a problematized perspective. Yet he never dares to<br>
venture beyond the viewpoints of these giants. While the study is about
>
reception, Weikart includes only the lofty peaks of the socialist<br>
movements. Admittedly, he defines his subject as the "leading theorists and
>
propagandists" (p. 8), but even here, he has excluded important socialists<br>
such as Lassalle with the justification that Darwinism was not
>
"particularly significant in their thought" (p. 8).<br>
>
Yet Lassalle was more widely read by rank-and-file socialists than either<br>
Marx or Engels. Does this not make his disinterest in Darwin of interest?
>
Also, where, as in Chapter V, "August Bebel's Popularization of Evolution,"<br>
the promise of a broader perspective emerges, this use of "popularization"
>
is understood as elite propaganda rather than popular reception. At no<br>
point do the rank and file Social Democrats, the Free Trade Unionists, the
>
members of ancillary organizations, or the broader circles of non-joining<br>
sympathizers and family members enter the discussion. Bebel's goal may
>
clearly have been to inculcate a harmonious synthesis of a non-Darwinian<br>
evolutionary theory with Marxism, but the reader ultimately has no sense of
>
the success of this effort.<br>
>
This is disappointing. German socialism was a mass movement with multiple<br>
potentialities and counter-currents expressed by those who identified to
>
varying degrees with socialism and often understood Marxism and Darwinism<br>
in heterodox ways. The role of Darwin's Descent on Kautsky's conversion to
>
materialism and ultimately socialism found similar parallels among everyday<br>
workers, many of whom never made the transformation to Kautsky's orthodox
>
Marxism. Indeed, Alfred Kelly, who provides the foreword to the book, has<br>
shown in his collection of working-class autobiographies that socialist
>
workers eagerly read evolutionary theory but often espoused Social<br>
Darwinist ideas without sensing any contradiction with the Marxist Erfurt
>
Program.<br>
>
At times, Weikart's exclusive focus on elites leads to paradoxical<br>
conclusions. For example, Weikart convincingly displays that Bebel and
>
post-Marx leaders of the SPD drew upon practical experience and multiple<br>
ideological sources rather than Darwin to inform their increasingly
>
evolutionary approach to social revolution. But he dismisses the influence<br>
of evolutionary theory as "making no inroads" into their ideas (p. 151).
>
Here, the distance of Weikart's study from popular reception blurs the<br>
negotiated (dare I say dialectical) relationship between theoreticians and
>
their socialintellectual context. While Weikart clearly situates Marx and
>
nineteenth-century biologists as products of their time, deeply infused<br>
with prevailing attitudes, he would have the reader minimize this same
>
contextual structuring inside socialist circles a few decades later.<br>
>
In the end, however, Weikart provides a methodically written, cogently<br>
argued, and impressively documented intellectual history. He shatters two
>
dominant myths: that Marxists applied Darwinism directly to social theory<br>
and that "the introduction of evolutionary biological ideas into socialist
>
theory in the late nineteenth century stripped Marxism of its revolutionary<br>
edge by replacing dialectical materialism and praxis with mechanical
>
materialism, and by fostering gradualism" (p. 149). While this reviewer<br>
would have enjoyed an expanded discussion of the ultimate significance of
>
this topic by including the reception and thus broader significance of<br>
these ideas among regular Germans, both socialist and non-socialist, as an
>
intellectual history Socialist Darwinism brings a freshly problematized<br>
analysis to an important chapter of socialist and indeed social
>
intellectual history.<br>
>
<br>
>
<br>
>
<br>
>
Library of Congress call number: HX273 .W514 1998<br>
Subjects:
>
Socialism--Germany--History<br>
Socialists--Germany
>
Social Darwinism--Germany<br>
Evolution (Biology)--Philosophy
>
Citation: Robert William Goodrich . "Review of Richard Weikart, Socialist<br>
Darwinism: Evolution in German Socialist Thought from Marx to Bernstein,"
>
H-Ideas, H-Net Reviews, March, 2001. URL:<br>
http://www.h-net.msu.edu/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=4475985369635.
>
<br>
>
<br>
>
Copyright 2001 by H-Net, all rights reserved. H-Net permits the<br>
redistribution and reprinting of this work for nonprofit, educational
>
purposes, with full and accurate attribution to the author, web location,<br>
date of publication, originating list, and H-Net: Humanities & Social
>
Sciences Online. For any other proposed use, contact the Reviews editorial<br>
staff at [email protected].