Witamy w serwisie internetowym Polskiego Towarzystwa Kreacjonistycznego

"T. rex fossil has 'soft tissues' " (2005)

"BBC News" UK edition, Thursday, 24 March, 2005; http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4379577.stm

Jeff Hecht, "Blood vessels recovered from T. rex bone" (2005)

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7195

Thomas Hayden, "Dances with fruit flies" (2005)

"U.S. News & World Report" 28 March 2005; http://www.usnews.com/usnews/culture/articles/050328/28evo.htm

Wojciech Mikołuszko, "Czy Darwin miał rację? Katolicy a teoria ewolucji" G.S. Johnstona (2005)

"Gazeta Wyborcza" 22-03-2005; http://serwisy.gazeta.pl/ksiazki/1,19970,2615124.html

Eugenie C. Scott, "Dealing with Antievolutionism"

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/fosrec/Scott1.html --- http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/fosrec/Scott2.html

Richard K. Stucky, "Paleontology: The Window to Science Education"

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/fosrec/Stucky.html

Jere H. Lipps, "The Decline of Reason?"

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/fosrec/Lipps.html

"Zbadanie teorii ewolucji"

Świecki Ruch Misyjny "Epifania"; http://www.epifania.pl/tekst.php?id=54&typ=B

G.S. McLean, Roger Oakland, Larry McLean, W poszukiwaniu prawdy o początkach (1999)

Wydawnictwo "Pojednanie", Lublin 1999.

Paul S.L. Johnson, Stworzenie (1938)

Paul S.L. Johnson, Epifaniczne wykłady Pisma Świętego, t. II. Stworzenie, Philadelphia, P.A., USA 1938, stron 225.

Richard A. Wiedenheft, "Evolution vs. Intelligent Design" (2005)

"Bible Advocate" March 2005, vol. 139, No. 2, pp. 4-7; http://www.cog7.org/BA/

Paweł Siwek "Ewolucjonizm w świetle nauki"

Pełna wersja książki w formacie DjVu (http://je.pl/2fk5)

Susan J. Lolle, Jennifer L. Victor, Jessica M. Young & Robert E. Pruitt, "Genome-wide non-mendelian inheritance of extra-genomic information in Arabidopsis" (2005)

"Nature" 24 March 2005, vol. 434, pp. 505-509; www.nature.com/nature. --- Abstract: --- A fundamental tenet of classical mendelian genetics is that allelic information is stably inherited from one generation to the next, resulting in predictable segregation patterns of differing alleles. Although several exceptions to this principle are known, all represent specialized cases that are mechanistically restricted to either a limited set of specific genes (for example mating type conversion in yeast) or specific types of alleles (for example alleles containing transposons3 or repeated sequences). Here we show that Arabidopsis plants homozygous for recessive mutant alleles of the organ fusion gene HOTHEAD5 (HTH) can inherit allele-specific DNA sequence information that was not present in the chromosomal genome of their parents but was present in previous generations. This previously undescribed process is shown to occur at all DNA sequence polymorphisms examined and therefore seems to be a general mechanism for extragenomic inheritance of DNA sequence information.We postulate that these genetic restoration events are the result of a template-directed process that makes use of an ancestral RNA-sequence cache. --- Omówienie w języku polskim: http://je.pl/geat --- Komentarz Jonathana Wellsa: http://je.pl/8lk4

John Ankerberg and John Weldon, "Truth in Advertising: Damaging the Cause of Science"

http://www.johnankerberg.com/Articles/science/SC0104W1E.htm

John Ankerberg and John Weldon, "Evolution, Logic and Increasing Doubts"

http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/science/SC0104W2A.htm

Frank Close, "The Quantum Universe" (2005)

Nature, 24 March 2005, vol. 434, s. 438-439; a review of "Science and Ultimate Reality: Quantum Theory, Cosmology and Complexity" edited by John D. Barrow, Paul C.W. Daview & Charles L. Harper, Jr, Cambridge University Press 2004.

David Limbaugh, "Slamming Intelligent Design" (2004)

DavidLimbaugh.com; http://www.davidlimbaugh.com/mt/archives/2004/12/slamming_intell.html#more

Krzysztof Zbytniewski, "Kosmiczny ksiądz i Marsjanie" (2004)

16 stycznia 2004; wywiad z Michałem Hellerem. Początek: "O tym, czy jesteśmy w Kosmosie sami, czy Jezus umarł także za grzechy kosmitów, i czego powinny uczyć się o stworzeniu świata dzieci, opowiada nam wybitny kosmolog, fizyk i filozof ksiądz profesor Michał Heller."

Christian C. Carman, "The electrons of the dinosaurs and the center of the Earth: comments on D.D. Turner's 'The past vs. the tiny: historical science and the abductive arguments for realism'" (2005)

"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science" 2005, vol. 36, pp. 171–173. --- Abstract: --- Turner [The past vs. the tiny: Historical science and the abductive arguments for realism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35A (2004) 1] claims that the arguments in favor of realism do not support with the same force both classes of realism, since they supply stronger reasons for experimental realism than for historical realism. I would like to make two comments, which should be seen as amplifications inspired by his proposal, rather than as a criticism. First, it is important to highlight that Turner's distinction between 'tiny' and 'past unobservables' is neither excluding nor exhaustive. Second, even if we agreed with everything that Turner says regarding the arguments for realism and their relative weight in order to justify the experimental or historical version, there is an aspect that Turner does not consider and that renders historical realism less problematic than experimental realism.

Derek D. Turner, "The past vs. the tiny: historical science and the abductive arguments for realism" (2004)

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2004, vol. 35, pp. 1–17. --- Abstract --- Scientific realism is fundamentally a view about unobservable things, events, processes, and so on, but things can be unobservable either because they are tiny or because they are past. The familiar abductive arguments for scientific realism lend more justification to scientific realism about the tiny than to realism about the past. This paper examines both the ‘‘basic’’ abductive arguments for realism advanced by philosophers such as Ian Hacking and Michael Devitt, as well as Richard Boyd’s version of the inference to the best explanation of the success of science, and shows that these arguments provide less support to historical than to experimental realism. This is because unobservably tiny things can function both as unifiers of the phenomena and as tools for the production of new phenomena, whereas things in the past can only serve as unifiers of the phenomena. The upshot is that realists must not suppose that by presenting arguments for experimental realism they have thereby defended realism in general.