Witamy w serwisie internetowym Polskiego Towarzystwa Kreacjonistycznego

"Catholics confront faith and evolution" (2006)

National Public Radio (NPR) January 1, 2006 Sunday; http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5078357

Elizabeth Culotta and Elizabeth Pennisi, "Evolution in Action" (2005)

"Science" 23 December 2005, vol. 310, no. 5756, s. 1878-1879; http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/310/5756/1878

Stephen C. Meyer, "Intelligent design is not creationism" (2006)

"The Daiy Telegraph" Filed: 28/01/2006; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/01/28/do2803.xml

Owen Williamson, "War Against Reason: The “Intelligent Design” Scam" (2006)

"Political Affairs" politicalaffaits.net Marxist Thought Online February 2006; http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/view/2624/1/147/

Fredric P. Nelson, M.D., "Darwin's Logical Fallacy" (b.d.)

http://www.evolutiondissected.com/pages/1/index.htm

Lisa Anderson, "It's no fun being a biology teacher in Kansas" (2005)

"The Chicago Tribune" December 29, 2005, 8:03 PM CST; http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-051229teacher-story,1,6183551.story?page=2&coll=chi-news-hed

Francis J. Beckwith, "Public Education, Religious Establishment, and the Challenge of Intelligent Design" (2003)

"Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, & Public Policy" 2003, vol. 17, no. 2, s. 461-519; http://homepage.mac.com/francis.beckwith/NDJLEPP.pdf

Francis J. Beckwith, "Science and Religion Twenty Years After McLean v. Arkansas: Evolution, Public Education, and the New Challenge of Intelligent Design" (2003)

"Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy" Spring 2003, vol. 26, no. 2, s. 455-499; http://homepage.mac.com/francis.beckwith/HJLPP.pdf

Francis J. Beckwith, "Gimme That Ol' Time Separation: A Review Review" (2005)

"Chapman Law Review" Spring 2005, vol. 8, no, 1. s. 329-327.

Eric Ryan Telfer, "The Science-Religion Dichotomy and the Intelligent Design Debate" (2005)

Work in Progress. Last up-dated 4/16/2005; http://www.geocities.com/e_telfer/UpdatedScience-ReligionDichotomyandID.html

R. Albert Mohler, Jr., "Darwin's Dangerous Idea--No Middle Ground" (2006)

Dr. Mohler's Blog, Tuesday, January 3, 2006; http://www.crosswalk.com/news/weblogs/mohler/

R. Albert Mohler, Jr., "Why Darwinism Survives" (2006)

Dr. Mohler's Blog, Tuesday, January 17, 2006; http://www.crosswalk.com/news/weblogs/mohler/

R. Albert Mohler, Jr., "Is God an Accident of Evolution?"(2006)

Dr. Mohler's Blog, Wednesday, January 18, 2006; http://www.crosswalk.com/news/weblogs/mohler/

Gordon Brumm, "Intelligent Design: Skeptical Thoughts about the Skepticism (2)" (2006)

"The Lakawood Observer" 08.29 AM / 11th January 2006; http://lakewoodobserver.com/home.php?which=1&article_id=309

Gordon Brumm, "Intelligent Design: Skeptical Thoughts about the Skepticism (1)" (2005)

"The Lakewood Observer" 12.54 PM / 30th December 2005; http://lakewoodobserver.com/home.php?which=1&article_id=293

Andrew Cline, "Stretching the Constitution to keep out intelligent design" (2006)

"The Baltimore Sun" January 2, 2006; http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bal-op.design02jan02,1,1400659.story?coll=bal-oped-headlines&ctrack=1&cset=true

Phyllis Schlafly, "False judge makes mockery of case for 'intelligent design'" (2006)

Townhall.com Jan 2, 2006; http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/phyllisschlafly/2006/01/02/180785.html

Rebecca Heald, "Serving Up a Plate of Chromosomes" (2006)

"Science" 20 January 2006, vol. 311, s. 343-344.

W.R. Stoeger, G.F.R. Ellis, and U. Kirchner, "Multiverses and Cosmology: Philosophical Issues" (2006)

Date (revised v2): Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:53:06 GMT (42kb); http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0407/0407329.pdf --- Abstract --- The idea of a multiverse -- an ensemble of universes or universe domains -- has received increasing attention in cosmology, both as the outcome of the originating process that generated our own universe, and as an explanation for why our universe appears to be fine-tuned for life and consciousness. Here we carefully consider how multiverses should be defined, stressing the distinction between the collection of all possible universes, and ensembles of really existing universes, which are essential for an anthropic argument. We show that such realised multiverses are by no means unique, and in general require the existence of a well-defined and physically motivated distribution function on the space of all possible universes. Furthermore, a proper measure on these spaces is also needed, so that probabilities can be calculated. We then discuss several other major physical and philosophical problems which arise in the context of ensembles of universes, including the emergence and causal effectiveness of self-consciousness, realized infinities, and fine- tuning, or the apparent need for very special initial conditions for our universe -- whether they or generalized generic primordial conditions are more fundamental. Then we briefly summarise scenarios like chaotic inflation, which suggest how ensembles of universe domains may be generated, and point out that the regularities which must underlie any systematic description of truly disjoint multiverses must imply some kind of common generating mechanism. Finally, we discuss the issue of testability, which underlies the question of whether multiverse proposals are really scientific propositions.

Jeff Israely, "Rome Weighs in (Gently) on Intelligent Design" (2006)

"Time" Posted Thursday, Jan. 19, 2006; http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1150808,00.html