Witamy w serwisie internetowym Polskiego Towarzystwa Kreacjonistycznego

Nick Matzke, "Note to meteorologists: You're next" (2005)

http://www.pandasthumb.org/pt-archives/001046.html --- Summary: In this essay, the author suggests that creationists have singled out evolutionary biology for denial for no objective reasons, as similar (usually fallacious) arguments can be suggested against any other science. As an example, Matzke disusses meteorology, whose concepts are plainly contrary to the Bible's many assertions of God directly causing meteorological phenomena such as rains, floods, and the like. Matzke suggests reasons for creationists's leaving meteorology alone while feverishly assaulting evolutionary biology. This essay has invoked an inordinately prolonged and heated discussion (several hundreds comments posted to the thread on Pandas's Thumb weblog).

Rodney Stark, "Fact, Fable, and Darwin" (2004)

"One America" September 2004; http://www.taemag.com/issues/articleid.18132/article_detail.asp

Mark Hartwig, "The Science of Design" (2005)

TheRealityCheck.org; http://www.therealitycheck.org/GuestColumnist/mhartwig040705.htm; repr. http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2501

Mark Hartwig, "Darwinists Deny the Obvious" (1996)

"Citizen" June 1996; http://www.family.org/cforum/fosi/origins/essays/a0026703.cfm

Mark Hartwig, "Whose Comfortable Myth?" (2002)

"Focus on the Family" 2002; http://www.family.org/fofmag/pp/a0021018.cfm

Denyse O'Leary, "National Geographic Cheerleads for Darwin, but Drops the Baton" (2005)

http://www.christianity.ca/faith/weblog/2005/1.07.html

Robin Leboe, "[r]evolution" (2005)

http://portal.monkeymovie.com/Articles/94.aspx

John Hanna, "Kansas debate focuses on defining science" (2005)

The Associated Press, May 16, 2005; http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7874967/

"Dealing with design" (2005)

Nature vol. 434, p. 1053 (28 April 2005); http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v434/n7037/full/4341053a.html

"When science meets religion in the classroom" (2005)

"Nature" 19 May 2005, vol. 435, no. 7040, s. 275-276.

"Darwin's evolution theory loses out in mock trial" (2005)

"Hindustan Times" May 16, 2005; http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1363727,0004.htm

Charles H. Lineweaver i Tamara M. Davis, "Nieporozumienia wokół wielkiego wybuchu" (2005)

"Świat Nauki" 2005, nr 5, s. 22-31; http://www.swiatnauki.pl/?q=art&n=200505a

"Zbyt konserwatywni na Darwina" (2005)

http://www.racjonalista.pl/index.php/s,11/t,4195

Wiesław Jaszczyński, "Ewolucjonistyczny kreacjonizm" (2005)

Oryginał: www.racjonalista.pl/kk.php/s,4138

"LOU DOBBS TONIGHT: Intelligent Design Versus Random Evolution" (2005)

LOU DOBBS TONIGHT Aired May 12, 2005; http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0505/12/ldt.01.html

Timothy Lamer, "An evolving debate" (2005)

"World Magazine" May 21, 2005; http://www.worldmag.com/subscriber/displayArticle.cfm?ID=10641

Nina J. Easton, "Scientist puts faith in evolution debate. Professor in Kansas resists 'design' idea" (2005)

"The Boston Globe" May 8, 2005; http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2005/05/08/scientist_puts_faith_in_evolution_debate/

Chris Mooney, "Creating a Controversy" (2005)

"The American Prospect" May 16, 2005; http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=9671

Jan Stradowski, "Planeta hobbitów" (2005)

Tygodnik "Wprost", Nr 1145 (07 listopada 2004; http://www.wprost.pl/ar/?O=69710

Jodi Wilgoren, "The Terms of Debate in Kansas" (2005)

"The New York Times" May 15, 2005, page 16.