Nowości

Del Ratzsch, "How Not to Critique Intelligent Design Theory. A Review of Niall Shanks, God, The Devil, and Darwin" (2005) pdf

"Ars Disputandi" 2005, vol. 5; http://www.arsdisputandi.org/

"Intelligent Design is Falsifiable" (2005)

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2812&program=CSC&callingPage=discoMainPage oraz http://tinyurl.com/dyl2l

Marcus Ross, "Who Believes What? Clearing up Confusion over Intelligent Design and Young-Earth Creationism" (2005) pdf

"Journal of Geoscience Education", May 2005, vol. 53, no. 3, p. 319-323. Patrz reakcję prezydenta National Association of Geology Teachers (NAGT): Geoff Feiss, "From the President - Re: Intelligent Design Article", http://creationism.org.pl/groups/ptkrmember/inteligentny-projekt/Feiss/document_view

Guillermo Gonzalez, "Habitable Zones in the Universe" (2005) pdf

Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres --- Abstract --- Habitability varies dramatically with location and time in the universe. This was recognized centuries ago, but it was only in the last few decades that astronomers began to systematize the study of habitability. The introduction of the concept of the habitable zone was key to progress in this area. The habitable zone concept was first applied to the space around a star, now called the Circumstellar Habitable Zone. Recently, other, vastly broader, habitable zones have been proposed. We review the historical development of the concept of habitable zones and the present state of the research. We also suggest ways to make progress on each of the habitable zones and to unify them into a single concept encompassing the entire universe. http://204.121.6.57/abs/astro-ph/0503298

Jonathan Witt, "The Origin of Intelligent Design" pdf

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=526

Robert S. Schwartz, M.D., "Faith Healers and Physicians — Teaching Pseudoscience by Mandate" (2005) pdf

"The New England Journal of Medicine" October 6, 2005, vol. 353, number 14, s. 1437-1439; www.nejm.org

Matthew J. Brayer, Barbara Forrest, Steven G. Gey, "Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Designe Creationism and the Constitution" (2005)

"Washington University Law Quarterly" 2005, vol. 83, no. 1, s. 1-149; http://law.wustl.edu/WULQ/83-1/p%201%20Brauer%20Forrest%20Gey%20book%20pages.pdf --- Abstract --- On several occasions during the last eighty years, states have attempted to either prohibit the teaching of evolution in public school science classes or counter the teaching of evolution with mandatory references to the religious doctrine of creationism. The Supreme Court struck down examples of the first two generations of these statutes, holding that they violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. A third generation of creationist legislation is now being proposed. Under this new generation of creationism legislation, science teachers would present so-called “intelligent design” theory as an alternative to evolution. Intelligent design theory asserts that a supernatural intelligence intervened in the natural world to dictate the nature and ordering of all biological species, which do not evolve from lower-to higher-order beings. This article considers whether these intelligent design creationism proposals can survive constitutional scrutiny. The authors analyze the religious, philosophical, and scientific details of intelligent design theory, and assess these details in light of the constitutional doctrine developed by the Court in its previous creationism decisions. The Article discusses several factors that pose problems for intelligent design theory, including the absence of objective scientific support for intelligent design, evidence of strong links between intelligent design and religious doctrine, the use of intelligent design to limit the dissemination of scientific theories that are perceived as contradicting religious teachings, and the fact that the irreducible core of intelligent design theory is what the Court has called the “manifestly religious” concept of a God or Supreme Being. Based on these details, the authors conclude that intelligent design theory cannot survive scrutiny under the constitutional framework used by the Court to invalidate earlier creationism mandates.

Edwin Bendyk, "I Bóg stworzył ewolucję" (2005)

Edwin Bendyk, I Bóg stworzył ewolucję, "Polityka" 2005, nr 03 (2487).

Marcin Gadziński, "Ameryka kłóci się o teorię Darwina" (2004)

"Gazeta Wyborcza" 6 grudnia 2004; http://serwisy.gazeta.pl/swiat/2029020,34254,2427062.html

John Rennie, "15 odpowiedzi na nonsensowne tezy kreacjonistów" (2002) pdf

"Świat Nauki" wrzesień 2002, s. 66-73.

William Jennings Bryan, "God and Evolution" (1922) pdf

"The New York Times" 26 February 1922, Section 7, 1: 6–9, 11: 1; http://www.ucl.ac.uk/sts/cain/texts/bryan/bryan.pdf

William Jennings Bryan, The Last Message of William Jennings Bryan, Fleming H. Revell Company, New York - Chicago - Toronto - London and Edinburgh 1925. pdf

Tekst niewygłoszonej mowy na tzw. procesie Scopesa w 1925 roku; http://www.ucl.ac.uk/sts/cain/texts/bryan/bryan_1925_last-message.pdf

J.B.S.Haldane, "The Cost of Natural Selection" (1957) pdf

"Journal of Genetics" 1957, vol. 55, s. 511-524, http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/ridley/classictexts/haldane2.pdf

David Stove, Darwinian Fairytales, Averbury Series in Philosophy, Aldershot 1995

 

H. Wayne House, "Darwinism and the Law: Can Non-Naturalistic Scientific Theories Survive Constitutional Challenge?" (2001) pdf

"Regent University Law Review" 2001, Vol. 13, s. 355-455.

Francis J. Beckwith, "Science and Religion Twenty Years After McLean v. Arkansas: Evolution, Public Education, and the New Challenge of Intelligent Design" (2003)

"Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy" Spring 2003, vol. 26, no. 2, s. 455-499; http://homepage.mac.com/francis.beckwith/HJLPP.pdf

Francis J. Beckwith, "Public Education, Religious Establishment, and the Challenge of Intelligent Design" (2003)

"Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, & Public Policy" 2003, vol. 17, no. 2, s. 461-519; http://homepage.mac.com/francis.beckwith/NDJLEPP.pdf

Armand Maurer. Darwin, Thomists, and Secondary Causality

Armand Maurer. Darwin, Thomists, and Secondary Causality. The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 57, no. 3 (March 2004), s. 491-514.

Fran O'Rourke. Aristotle and the Metaphysics of Evolution.

Fran O'Rourke. Aristotle and the Metaphysics of Evolution. The Review of Metaphysics. vol. 58, no. 1 (Sept. 2004), s. 3-59.

Constance Areson Clark, "Evolution for John Doe: Pictures, the Public, and the Scopes Trial Debate" (2001)

"The Journal of American History" March 2001, pp. 1275-1303.

Aktualnie nie ma kryteriów wyszukiwania. Dodaj je przy pomocy zakładki 'kryteria'.